De May v. Moore & Bruce, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the continuous representation rule applied to a trustee/beneficiary relationship
• stating that Knight “merely rejected the exhaustion of appeals rule,” which was not at issue in that case
• “neither actual dishonesty nor intent to deceive is the essential element [of constructive fraud]; and negligence so gross as to deceive might be such fraud”
• “neither actual dishonesty nor intent to deceive is the essential element [of constructive fraud]; and negligence so gross as to deceive might be such fraud”
• considering the policy rationale when concluding that the rule applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ying Qing Lu v. Lezell
  District of Columbia· 2014-05-27· cited 34×
• Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2019-01-30· cited 30×
• Hiligh v. Sands
  D.C. Circuit· 2019-06-10· cited 30×
• Cordoba Initiative Corporation v. Deak
  District of Columbia· 2012-10-26· cited 26×
• Himmelstein v. Comcast of the District, L.L.C.
  D.C. Circuit· 2012-12-10· cited 24×
• Seed Co. v. Westerman Ex Rel. Estate of Westerman
  D.C. Circuit· 2016-08-12· cited 22×
• Beach TV Props., Inc. v. Solomon
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-29· cited 21×
• Jones v. Lattimer
  District of Columbia· 2014-03-06· cited 15×
• Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP
  District of Columbia· 2015-04-30· cited 13×
• Perry v. Scholar
  District of Columbia· 2010-03-19· cited 9×
• Seed Co. v. Westerman
  District of Columbia· 2014-07-30· cited 5×
• Himmelstein v. Comcast of the District, L.L.C.
  District of Columbia· 2012-12-10
• Elkalibe v. Ibiza Nightclub Dc, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2011-04-13
• Seed Company Limited v. Westerman
  District of Columbia· 2014-07-30
• Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. Soloman
  District of Columbia· 2018-03-29
• Hiligh v. Sands, Jr
  District of Columbia· 2019-06-10
• Yerrell v. EMJ Realty Co., AKA CCP, LLC
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-09-01

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bennett v. Kiggins
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-08-18· cited 157×
• Greene v. Greene
  New York Court of Appeals· 1982-05-18· cited 146×
• Bussineau v. President of Georgetown College
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-11-26· cited 129×
• Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-03-20· cited 123×
• Knight v. Furlow
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-02-06· cited 108×
• Weisberg v. Williams, Connolly & Califano
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-08-14· cited 61×
• Dalo v. Kivitz
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-07· cited 49×
• Greene v. Morgan, Theeler, Cogley & Petersen
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-02-18· cited 43×
• R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. Winston
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-18· cited 38×
• Wagner v. Sellinger
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-04-29· cited 37×
• Rick v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1947-03-31· cited 25×
• Bradley v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers Dispute Resolution
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-12-30· cited 22×
• Dignelli v. Berman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2002-04-15· cited 20×
• Gallucci v. Schaffer
  District of Columbia· 2007-08-28· cited 5×
• Nguyen v. Voorthuis Opticians, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2007-03-21· cited 5×
• Bastys v. Rothschild
  Second Circuit· 2005-11-16· cited 5×