De May v. Moore & Bruce, LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the continuous representation rule applied to a trustee/beneficiary relationship
• stating that Knight “merely rejected the exhaustion of appeals rule,” which was not at issue in that case
• “neither actual dishonesty nor intent to deceive is the essential element [of constructive fraud]; and negligence so gross as to deceive might be such fraud”
• “neither actual dishonesty nor intent to deceive is the essential element [of constructive fraud]; and negligence so gross as to deceive might be such fraud”
• considering the policy rationale when concluding that the rule applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).