R.C. Olmstead, Inc. v. CU Interface, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant does not “circumvent or bypass any technological measure” when he uses “the approved methodology ... to access the [copyrighted material]”.
• granting defendant summary judgment because, inter alia, no showing access to information was improper since owner did not have confidentiality agreement with third party
• “Simply put, [the defendant] did not circumvent or bypass any technological measures of the [plaintiff’s] software— it merely used a username and password— the approved methodology— to access the software.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. Wilson
  D. Maryland· 2011-11-04· cited 94×
• Kuvedina, LLC v. Cognizant Technology Solutions
  S.D. Ohio· 2013-05-21· cited 25×
• Dish Network L.L.C. v. World Cable Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2012-09-28· cited 6×
• Hetzer-Young v. Elano Corp.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-21· cited 4×
• Dice Corp. v. Bold Technologies
  E.D. Michigan· 2012-10-25

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
• Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-05-25· cited 2,773×
• Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
  Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 2,678×
• Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-07-25· cited 548×
• Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-Appellee
  Fourth Circuit· 2001-11-29· cited 436×
• Kenty v. Transamerica Premium Insurance
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 371×
• Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & Hadden
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-04-07· cited 313×
• Albert White v. Turfway Park Racing Association, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-08-01· cited 270×
• Vodusek v. Bayliner Marine Corp.
  Fourth Circuit· 1995-12-06· cited 256×
• Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
  Second Circuit· 1992-04-02· cited 236×
• Aerel, S.R.L. v. Pcc Airfoils, L.L.C.
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-05-23· cited 228×
• Smith v. Howard Johnson Co.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1993-08-04· cited 212×
• Adkins v. Wolever
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-02-04· cited 196×
• Fulson v. City of Columbus
  S.D. Ohio· 1992-08-26· cited 187×
• Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-02-08· cited 175×
• Louis M. Kohus v. John v. Mariol James F. Mariol Jvm Innovation & Design
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-05-20· cited 114×