R.C. Olmstead, Inc. v. CU Interface, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reference to screenshots in the expert report is sufficient to disclosure that the screenshots will be used as exhibits at trial
• finding that an expert’s two page report that summarily stated an opinion and attached 197 pages of exhibits without making any specific references in his report to the supporting material “violated [FRCP] 26(a)(2)(B
• “[The expert’s] report requires Defendants to trudge through 197 pages to find for themselves which page(s) support each [of the expert’s] conclusions. Rule 26(a)(2)(B) requires far more than the lackluster effort put forward by [the expert] in this report.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).