Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/17/2014
Rayco Mfg., Inc. v. Beard Equip. Co.
Citations
- 2014 Ohio 970
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing a case involving an indemnification provision in a commercial contract from those “involving insurance companies where the insurance company has an inherent duty to defend the insured”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-06· cited 7,689×
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 3,797×
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 3,715×
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 757×
- State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1996-05-08· cited 678×
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 245×
- Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 124×
- Allen v. Standard Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 93×
- Preferred Mutual Insurance v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court· 1986-04-11· cited 90×
- Keller v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court· 2003-11-05· cited 53×
- Krasny-Kaplan Corp. v. Flo-Tork, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1993-04-07· cited 40×
- Williams v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court· 1978-04-26· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 2007-06-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.