Ray v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Article 42.12, [Ejection 5 does not have a substantial compliance provision, nor do we find that one is implied.”
• fail-ure to give § 5 information renders guilty plea involuntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-12· cited 190×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-04· cited 161×
• Ray v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 34×
• Joyner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-11-02· cited 19×
• Martinez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-09-14· cited 13×
• Ward v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-12-06· cited 12×
• Fregia v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1995-07-20· cited 8×
• Fisher v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-11· cited 6×
• Mark Lloyd Ward v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1995-08-30
• Charlie Fred Pospisil, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-12-05

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 1,170×
• Burks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-09· cited 436×
• McNew v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-02-15· cited 264×
• Roberts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-02-14· cited 38×
• Peters v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-10· cited 30×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-06-21· cited 18×
• Graham v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1994-03-17· cited 16×
• Price v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1992-11-25· cited 12×
• Arriola v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-13· cited 5×