Utah Supreme Court· 9/3/2010

Rawlings v. Rawlings

Citations

2010 UT 52
240 P.3d 754
664 Utah Adv. Rep. 9
2010 Utah LEXIS 116
2010 WL 3447589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “determining whether circumstances surrounding the parties’ interactions [a]re inequitable is a fact-intensive process”
recognizing the flexible nature of the claim
recognizing the flexible nature of the claim
\The matter of witness credibility ... falls within the provinee of the fact-finder.\
“To allow such a cause of action in the face of an enforceable contract governing the parties’ rights would effectively add or modify terms for which they had not bargained.”
“To allow such a cause of action in the face of an enforceable contract governing the parties’ rights would effectively add or modify terms for which they had not bargained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durrant, Durham, Wilkins, Parrish, Nehring, Durrant'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rawlings v. Rawlings

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.