Rau v. Christy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• replacement of older fence that “wasn’t too good a fence” was “inconsistent neither with tenancy nor possession which is presumed in right of common title for the joint benefit of all tenants in common.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dyer v. Cotton
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-11-18· cited 61×
• BP America Production Co. v. Marshall
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-04-30· cited 39×
• Spiller v. Woodard
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-05-02· cited 22×
• Radford v. Garza
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-08-30· cited 18×
• Hernandez v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-02-04· cited 12×
• Sims v. Cage
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1975-05-15· cited 6×
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-12-10
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-12-10

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Todd v. Bruner
  Texas Supreme Court· 1963-01-23· cited 74×
• Alexander v. Kennedy
  Texas Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 41×
• Killough v. Hinds
  Texas Supreme Court· 1960-10-05· cited 36×
• Poenisch v. Quarnstrom
  Texas Supreme Court· 1962-10-31· cited 34×
• Udell v. Peak
  Texas Supreme Court· 1888-04-17· cited 30×
• Vasquez v. Meaders
  Texas Supreme Court· 1956-05-23· cited 24×
• Houk v. Kirby Petroleum Co.
  Texas Commission of Appeals· 1933-11-28· cited 17×
• Achille v. Baird
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1962-10-11· cited 8×