Skip to main content
· 11/18/2010

Dyer v. Cotton

Citations

  • 333 S.W.3d 703
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 9244
  • 2010 WL 4676982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by determining that good cause existed, in part, because both parties were equally able to investigate and locate
  • stating appellate courts defer to factfinders’ findings on contested evidence 32 and witness credibility
  • stating appellate courts defer to fact-finders’ findings on contested evidence and witness credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jane Bland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.