Ransone v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Gethers held that a defendant is not entitled to jail credit when authorities merely place a hold or detainer against him or her unless the hold or detainer is the sole basis for the defendant’s incarceration
• refusing to double credit presentence jail time against consecutive sentences in two separate cases when the defendant was held in custody for both
• applying the tipsy coachman rule to “affirm for reasons other than those ... relied on by the trial court in denying the motion”
• clarifying Trout and explaining, “[pjursuant to Daniels [v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ransone v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-10-07· cited 26×
• Cregg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-25· cited 7×
• Mount v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-14· cited 5×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-01· cited 4×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-30· cited 4×
• Bagley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-07· cited 4×
• State v. Vaden.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2023-03-15· cited 2×
• Emmanuel Sims v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-04· cited 1×
• Harrison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-14
• Martinez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-25
• Norder v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-04
• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11
• Lus Dary De Souza v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-12-20
• Mark Derefaka v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-08-13