Ransone v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Gethers held that a defendant is not entitled to jail credit when authorities merely place a hold or detainer against him or her unless the hold or detainer is the sole basis for the defendant’s incarceration
• refusing to double credit presentence jail time against consecutive sentences in two separate cases when the defendant was held in custody for both
• applying the tipsy coachman rule to “affirm for reasons other than those ... relied on by the trial court in denying the motion”
• clarifying Trout and explaining, “[pjursuant to Daniels [v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).