Randy Haight v. LaDonna Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoners' exercise of religion was substantially burdened when they were permitted some, but not all, of the food required to conduct their religious ceremony
• concluding that, as an exercise of Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause, RLUIPA did not authorize claims for monetary damages against state officials in their individual capacities
• concluding that, as an exercise of Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause, RLUIPA did not authorize claims for monetary damages against state officials in their individual capacities
• concluding that, as an exercise of Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause, RLUIPA failed to authorize claims for monetary damages against state officials in their individual capacities
• holding that awarding “individual-capacity, money-damages . . . [under] RLUIPA [is] inappropriate”
• holding that monetary damages under RLUIPA are not available for individual-capacity claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Randy Haight v. LaDonna Thompson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Randy Haight v. LaDonna Thompson
  Sixth Circuit· 2014-08-15