Aiello v. West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that New Jersey’s current bribery statute, like its predecessor, is intended t.o “proscribe conduct ... which ‘denigrates the integrity of our public institutions’ ” (quoting State v. Ferro, 128 N.J.Super. 353, 320 A.2d 177, 180 (Ct. App. Div. 1974))
• describing bribery scheme as paying money “in exchange for a ‘promised’ or ‘definitive’ vote” by municipal committee so as to “insure favorable action” on local development project
• requiring “subjective intent on the part of the actor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).