Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/15/1986

Randolph v. Randolph

Citations

508 A.2d 996
67 Md. App. 577
1986 Md. App. LEXIS 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

vacating monetary award in light of reversal of counsel fees, and vacating alimony for reconsideration in light of new monetary award
vacating monetary award in light of reversal of counsel fees, and vacating alimony for reconsideration in light of new monetary award
declining to address appellee’s petition for attorneys fees, which she filed in the appellate court, “because there are various factors to be considered, including the financial status, resources, and needs of each of the parties ... with which the trial court is familiar”
“The statute is designed to achieve equity between the parties; it does not require an equal division of marital property.”
“The statute is designed to achieve equity between the parties; it does not require an equal division of marital property.”
husband’s no-fault divorce, obtained in Virginia, while divorce action was pending in Maryland, “did not resolve any of the other issues between the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop Bloom and Robert M. Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.