Randolph v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence proved declarant knew statement was against her interest because she admitted, while under arrest for credit card theft, that she and appellant went to the airport “to steal ... to pick pockets”
• holding evidence proved declarant knew statement was against her penal interest because she admitted, while under arrest for credit card theft, that she and defendant went to the airport “to steal . . . to pick pockets”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).