Randall v. Randall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The general rule is that an engagement ring is nonmarital property.\
• \The general rule is that an engagement ring is nonmarital property.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Moody v. Newton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-01· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gill v. Shively
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-17· cited 25×
• Melvik v. Melvik
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-13· cited 7×
• Rosen v. Rosen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-28· cited 2×
• Malone v. Malone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-25· cited 1×