Moody v. Newton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a motion for rehearing is required to preserve alleged errors that first appear on the face of a final judgment
• “Because the alleged error first appeared in the final judgment, [the] Former [spouse] was required to bring this matter to the lower court’s attention in a motion for rehearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Antonio Scognamillo v. Tiffany Jamison, f/k/a Tiffany Scognamillo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-11-15
• LINDA POWELL vs D&D VILLAGE CONSTRUCTION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND IRENE DEMMIE
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-11-22
• SHARIN KAYE JOHNSON vs ERIC PAUL JOHNSON
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2022-11-04
• Rachael Morelli v. Sean J. Bordelon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-09-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hamilton v. RL BEST INTERN.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-06· cited 24×
• Cabrera v. Cabrera
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-11· cited 16×
• Hentze v. Denys
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-01· cited 15×
• Child v. Child
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-05· cited 8×
• Melvik v. Melvik
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-13· cited 7×
• Newman v. Newman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-31· cited 4×
• Randall v. Randall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-28· cited 2×

Other cases named Moody v. Newton

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Moody v. Newton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-01