Skip to main content

Ranck v. Bonal Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 359 A.2d 748
  • 467 Pa. 569
  • 1976 Pa. LEXIS 642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Rule 1531(f) only provides for the dissolution of a preliminary injunction; it does not preclude a subsequent adjudication of' the final complaint
  • concurring opinion of Roberts, J., joined by Pomeroy, Nix and Manderino, JJ.
  • preliminary injunction issued after unrecorded ex parte hearing was invalid, where there was nothing in record \to indicate either the requisite `immediate and irreparable injury' or the impossibility of giving notice\
  • preliminary injunction issued after unrecorded ex parte hearing was invalid, where there was nothing in record “to indicate either the requisite ‘immediate and irreparable injury’ or the impossibility of giving notice”
  • “Rule 1531(f) provides only for the dissolution of the preliminary injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.