Blount v. Rizzi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it is for Congress, not this Court, to rewrite the statute.”
• noting that prior restraints \require 'prompt judicial review' * * * to prevent the administrative decision of the censor from achieving an effect of finality\
• noting that prior restraints “require ‘prompt 19 judicial review’ * * * to prevent the administrative decision of the censor from achieving an effect of finality”
• stating that in Freedman the Court “held that to avoid constitutional infirmity a scheme of administrative censorship must ... require ‘prompt judicial review—a final judicial determination on the merits within a specified, brief period”
• declaring that “it is for Congress, not this Court, to rewrite the statute”
• invalidating postal rules permitting restrictions on the use of the mails for allegedly obscene materials because the rules lacked Freedman safeguards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).