Rampersaud v. Barr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] restitution award can, in some cases, reliably establish loss to the victims of a fraud offense.”
• “Specifically, the BIA and IJ failed to consider, as is required by Nijhawan, whether more than $10,000 in victim losses were ‘tied to the specific count[ ] covered by [Rampersaud’s] conviction’ for insurance fraud.”
• “Specifically, the BIA and IJ failed to consider, as is required by Nijhawan, whether more than $10,000 in victim losses were ‘tied to the specific count[ ] covered by [Rampersaud’s] conviction’ for insurance fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lionel Bogle v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-12-29· cited 6×
• Lionel Bogle v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-06-23· cited 1×
• Arman Khalulyan v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-03-30

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura
  Supreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 3,361×
• Nasrallah v. Barr
  Supreme Court· 2020-06-01· cited 756×
• Nijhawan v. Holder
  Supreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 738×
• Shobinder Gill v. Immigration and Naturalization Services
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-18· cited 366×
• Oyenike Alaka v. Attorney General of the United States Secretary of Department of Homeland Security
  Third Circuit· 2006-08-23· cited 218×
• Pierre v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2009-12-08· cited 118×
• Baswell Francis v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States
  Second Circuit· 2006-03-27· cited 51×
• Carlos Bastardo-Vale v. Attorney General United States
  Third Circuit· 2019-08-12· cited 38×