Skip to main content
· 9/24/1991

Ramirez v. USAA Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 234 Cal. App. 3d 391
  • 285 Cal. Rptr. 757
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 11719
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7723
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the insured may amend its complaint to allege that the insurer breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing because it allegedly failed to disclose the existence of UIM coverage to a known class-two insured
  • rejecting the insurer’s claim that the class-two insured’s retention of an attorney relieved the insurer of its duty of disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.