Weber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding plaintiffs had not “clear[ed] the hurdle[] of commonality” where the alleged injury under Chapter 93A was based on varying oral representations by defendant’s salespeople
• noting that a “finding of a predominance of common questions . . . [is] hard to find in such a grab-bag of individualized factual findings” and denying class certification
• proposed class of persons who purchased vanishing premium policies based on “misleading or fraudulent actuarial assumptions and projections that were not disclosed to marketing employees and agents” not ascertainable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).