Oregon Supreme Court· 9/26/2006

Ramirez v. State

Citations

143 P.3d 772
341 Or. 449
2006 Ore. LEXIS 942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying substantive criteria for parole release provided in the version of the statute in effect at the time of the petitioner’s crime; applying procedural requirements in effect at the time of the hearing
“Due process is flexible and calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.”
“Oregon courts impose constructive trusts as remedial devices to avoid unjust enrichment when no other adequate remedy is available.”
“In short, in a proceeding for declar- atory relief, the claimant’s pleading must allege a cognizable theory of relief, which if proved, would support the declaration sought.”
“A constructive trust is merely a procedural device to which the courts resort in order to effect restitution of property in specie. It is not a part of the substantive law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
unconscionability may involve deception, compulsion, or genuine lack of consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.