Vasquez-Lopez v. Beneficial Oregon, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a cost-sharing provision in an arbitration clause was “sufficiently onerous to act as a deterrent to [the] plaintiffs’ vindication of their claim”
• concluding that a cost-sharing provision in an arbitration clause was \sufficiently onerous to act as a deterrent to [the] plaintiffs' vindication of their claim\
• noting that plaintiffs could not read the contract they signed and were misled as to the contract’s provisions
• stating that the plaintiffs’ damages would have been “catastrophic” had predatory lender’s plan gone on unchecked
• stating that we review legal issues “for errors of law—what the federal courts call ‘de novo’ review”
• stating that we review legal issues “for errors of law—what the federal courts call ‘de novo’ review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).