Ramirez-Molina v. Ziglar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that on direct appeal from a reinstatement order the court retained the power to hear constitutional and legal challenges to the underlying deportation order
• finding that an alien’s failure to contest his removability in his original deportation proceedings is a “critical factor in denying claims that deportation proceedings constituted a gross miscarriage of justice”
• noting that there is no precise standard, for determining what constitutes a gross miscarriage of justice and dismissing petition for lack of jurisdiction after concluding that petitioner had not demonstrated a gross miscarriage of justice
• requiring a “gross miscarriage of justice” as a jurisdictional requirement for a collateral attack on a removal order
• noting difference in case law between a collateral attack in the context of a petition for review of a reinstatement decision and criminal prosecution for illegal reentry
• a challenge to an already-executed initial removal order on the grounds that the initial order was invalid is a collateral attack on the initial removal order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).