Lorenzo v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that strict limitations set forth in Section 1252(e) preclude judicial review of “any constitutional or statutory claims related to the underlying” expedited removal order
• noting that we review the Board’s determination of “constitutional and legal questions de novo”
• addressing conflict between two provisions of the Immigration and Naturalization Act
• “[W]e may no longer categorically hold that we lack jurisdiction to review constitutional and statutory claims related to all underlying removal orders.”
• “[W]e may no longer categorically hold that we lack jurisdiction to review constitutional and statutory claims related to all underlying removal orders.”
• “Congress clearly provided for our review of ‘constitutional claims or questions of law’ related to reinstate- ment orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).