First Circuit· 7/14/2014

Ramirez-Lluveras v. Rivera-Merced

Citations

759 F.3d 10
2014 WL 3398427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that cautionary language stating “[p]rospective 12 investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements” is 13 sufficient
holding that an ALJ errs by rejecting or assigning minimal 2 weight to a medical opinion “while doing nothing more than . . . criticizing it with boilerplate 3 language that fails to offer a substantive basis”
holding that courts can 23 “remand for further proceedings when, even though all conditions of the credit-as-true rule 24 are satisfied, an evaluation of the record as a whole creates serious doubt that a claimant 25 is, in fact, disabled”
stating that a plaintiff must show that “officials had knowledge of facts” from which they could “draw the inference” of “a substantial risk of serious harm”
finding that the ALJ erred by improperly singling out a few periods 23 of temporary well-being from a sustained period of impairment and relied on those 24 1 instances to discredit a claimant
holding statements of “repeated assurances that FDA approval was 16 ‘imminent’” as not puffery because “‘the company, whose financial success depended on FDA 17 approval . . . knew that [approval] was not [imminent].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Torruella, Kayatta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.