Camilo-Robles v. Hoyos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court may not impose liability when proper screening or supervision mechanisms would not have prevented the constitutional violation
• holding that payments in class action settlement of an ERISA claim to at-will employees were FICA wages where each class member's award was based on the member's length of service with the employer
• noting that this formulation implies the necessary showing of causation as well as deliberate indifference
• stating that in addition to showing defendant’s deliberate indifference, plaintiff must demonstrate causation
• stating, without addressing Richardson issue, that privately employed police psychiatrists are eligible to raise defense of qualified immunity
• denying supervisor’s defense of qualified immunity where he “was put on notice” of subordinate’s history of reckless behavior and failed to permanently disarm him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).