Skip to main content
· 5/11/2017

Ralph Daniel Wright, Jr. v. State of Florida

Citations

  • 221 So. 3d 512
  • 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 587
  • 2017 WL 1954977
  • 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a]lthough damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment are mutually exclusive, it is accepted practice to pursue both theories at the pleading stage”
  • \An amended complaint is futile if the amended claims would not survive a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim\
  • court may not credit factual assertions “not supported by the summary judgment record”
  • court may not credit factual assertions “not supported by the summary judgment record”
  • court may not credit factual assertions “not supported by the summary judgment record”
  • denial of motion to amend complaint reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Labarga, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Lawson, Canady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.