Raines v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 943.0435 violates equal protection where it includes “offenderfs] convicted of false imprisonment in the definition of ‘sexual offender,’ without a concomitant sexual component”
• holding that sexual offender designation was unconstitutionally applied to the defendant where “it [wa]s clear that the predicate crime [of false imprisonment] [wa]s totally devoid of a sexual component”
• “Because appellant was convicted of false imprisonment, one of the enumerated offenses in the definition of ‘sexual offender,’ he was required to register.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John Doe v. James T. Moore
  Eleventh Circuit· 2005-06-06· cited 178×
• State v. Druktenis
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-01-30· cited 100×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-18· cited 39×
• ACLU OF NM v. City of Albuquerque
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-05-18· cited 35×
• State v. Whalen
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-11-21· cited 15×
• State of Arizona v. Craig Victor Coleman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-11-22· cited 8×
• Munroe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-03· cited 7×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
• Doe v. Poritz
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-25· cited 688×
• State v. Ward
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 303×
• State v. Yu
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-05-08· cited 43×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-07· cited 3×