Railroad Co. v. Brown
Citations
- 84 U.S. 445
- 21 L. Ed. 675
- 17 Wall. 445
- 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1383
Syllabus
<p>1. An act of Congress, in eases o'f a suit against a railroad 'company which it incorporated, authorized service of process “on any director of the company.” On a suit brought, the marshal made a return of service¡ July 6th, 1868, on J. S., “ reputed to be one of the directors of the eom- . pany.” The record showed'that on the 5th of May, 1866, J. S. was, in fact, one of the directors. Held, sufficient service, in the absence of proof, that J. S. was-not one.of the directors at the time of service; and the defendant having appeared and moved, for want of sufficient service, the'opening of a judgment which had been obtained for default; which motion as atked for, the court refused, but granted on condition that the defendant appeared ; which he did, and proceeded to trial.</p> <p>2. A railroad corporation run on the joint account of a receiver of part of it and the lessees of the remaining part, held liable for injuries committed, by a servant of the parties working it, upon the person of a passenger whom 'such servant improperly expelled from a car, into which the passenger had entered; the railroad corporation having allowed tickets to be issued in its own name, in the same form as it had done before the road was leased, and the passenger, for aught that appeared, not knowing that the railroad corporation was not itself managing the road.</p> <p>3. An act of Congress passed in 1863, which gave certain privileges which it asked to a railroad corporation, enacted also'that “ no person shall bo excluded from the cars on account of color.” Held, that this meant that persons of color should travel in the same cars that white ones did, and along with them in such cars ¡ and that the enactment was not satisfied by the company’s providing cars assigned exclusively to people of color, though they were as good as those which they assigned exclusively for white persons, and in fact the very cars which were, at certain times, assigned exclusively to white persons.</p>
Judges: Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court· 1896-05-18· cited 1,034×
- East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. CulbersonTexas Supreme Court· 1888-11-13· cited 51×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court· 1894-12-10· cited 45×
- Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.Circuit Court of Tennessee· 1893-07-27· cited 44×
- Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky· 1896-07-01· cited 41×
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia· 1906-12-20· cited 29×
- Braslin v. Somerville Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1887-09-19· cited 29×
- Attorney General v. Haverhill Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1913-05-26· cited 29×
- Balsley v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-10-06· cited 27×
- Moorshead v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1907-03-30· cited 27×
- Lee v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-02-19· cited 20×
- Carr v. Corning, Superintendent of Public Schools Browne Junior High School Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. MagdeburgerD.C. Circuit· 1950-02-14· cited 19×
- Chollette v. Omaha & Republican Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court· 1889-04-04· cited 17×
- Southern Ry. Co. v. HusseyEighth Circuit· 1930-06-26· cited 15×
- Moorshead v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1906-05-22· cited 15×
- Memphis & C. R. v. HoechnerSixth Circuit· 1895-05-07· cited 14×
- Palmer v. Utah & Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1888-02-08· cited 13×
- Muntz v. Algiers & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1903-11-30· cited 13×
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. SampleIndiana Court of Appeals· 1915-04-02· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1905-03-09· cited 12×
Other cases named Railroad Co. v. Brown
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.