Rahl v. Bande

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the factors considered in deciding whether to equitably remand pursuant to Section 1452(b) are substantially similar to those considered when deciding whether to abstain pursuant to Section 1334(c)(1)
• identifying relevant equitable factors, including the predominance of state law issues, judicial economy, involvement of non-debtors, relatedness of the state proceeding to the bankruptcy case, and the possibility of forum shopping
• “Absent [§ 544(b)(1)], the [t]rustee would lack standing to bring [a state law fraudulent conveyance] claim ...,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).