Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 7/28/2004

Rahl v. Bande

Citations

  • 316 B.R. 127
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24936
  • 2004 WL 2418056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the factors considered in deciding whether to equitably remand pursuant to Section 1452(b) are substantially similar to those considered when deciding whether to abstain pursuant to Section 1334(c)(1)
  • identifying relevant equitable factors, including the predominance of state law issues, judicial economy, involvement of non-debtors, relatedness of the state proceeding to the bankruptcy case, and the possibility of forum shopping
  • “Absent [§ 544(b)(1)], the [t]rustee would lack standing to bring [a state law fraudulent conveyance] claim ...,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William C. Conner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Rahl v. Bande

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.