Renaissance Cosmetics, Inc. v. Development Specialists Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the fact that no party was a New York citizen neutralized some comity concerns that would favor remand
• combining “the fact that any New York law at issue is not unusually complex or unsettled” with other circumstances to neutralize any comity concerns that would favor remand
• “This lack of complexity ‘significantly undercuts the degree to which the state law factor weighs in favor of remand to [the] New York courts.’ ”
• “On October 24, 2001, the Bondholders and defendant Chanin removed the Action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).