Rafferzeder v. Zellner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred by failing to reduce homeowners’ award by the amount saved in not paying contractor the full contract price because such a result constituted a windfall to the homeowner
• questions of value are peculiarly for determination of fact finder where there is any data upon which fact finder may exercise its own knowledge and ideas
• questions of value are peculiarly for determination of fact finder where there is any data upon which fact finder may exercise its own knowledge and ideas
• questions of value are peculiarly for determination of fact finder where there is any data upon which fact finder may exercise its own knowledge and ideas
• “Questions of value are peculiarly for the determination of the factfinder, where there is any data in the evidence upon which the factfinder may legitimately exercise its own knowledge and ideas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).