Jimenez v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there was no policy in the record, but considering damages where the plaintiff’s argument was that they paid for a policy and did not get it
• noting that there was no policy in the record, but considering damages where the plaintiff’s argument was that they paid for a policy and did not get it
• discussing bad faith in a different context but explaining that it “may be shown by demonstrating that under the policy and under the facts surrounding the response to that demand, the insurer had no ‘good cause’ for resisting and delaying payment” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).