Supreme Court of Missouri· 1/14/1957
Quinn v. Buchanan
Citations
- 298 S.W.2d 413
- 39 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2492
- 1957 Mo. LEXIS 562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that Article I, § 29 is part of the Missouri Constitution’s Bill of Rights, which is primarily a limitation on government
- enjoining an employer from engaging in activity designed to prevent its employees from organizing
- enjoining an employer from engaging in activity designed to prevent its employees from organizing
- “It is evident that the constitutional provision guaranteeing employees the right to organize and bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing does not cast upon all employers a correlative obligation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hyde
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strahler v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri· 1986-02-18· cited 105×
- Brawner v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1959-09-14· cited 63×
- Vogts v. GuerretteSupreme Court of Colorado· 1960-05-02· cited 58×
- Cooper v. Nutley Sun Printing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1961-11-20· cited 55×
- State Ex Rel. Missey v. City of CaboolSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-04-14· cited 54×
- Medina v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1963-12-16· cited 49×
- Herbertson v. RussellSupreme Court of Colorado· 1962-05-07· cited 34×
- Maddock v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1965-02-08· cited 31×
- American Federation of Teachers v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-11-20· cited 31×
- Morris v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1960-09-12· cited 28×
- Swift & Company v. DoeSupreme Court of Missouri· 1958-03-10· cited 22×
- IND. DAIRY WORKERS UNION OF HIGHTSTOWN v. Milk Drivers and Dairy Employees Local No. 680Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-06-17· cited 22×
- State v. BachelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-06-26· cited 15×
- Simpson County Steeplechase Ass'n v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1995-05-05· cited 15×
- Eastern Missouri Coalition of Police, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 15 v. City of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-11-20· cited 14×
- Dávila v. Secretario de EstadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1960-08-04· cited 12×
- Taylor v. WelleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1960-05-09· cited 10×
- Strinni v. Mehlville Fire Protection Dist.E.D. Missouri· 2010-01-06· cited 8×
- Independent Stave Co. v. HigdonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1978-10-10· cited 8×
- West Central Missouri Region Lodge 50 of The Fraternal Order of Police v. The city of Grandview, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-01-27· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court· 1930-05-26· cited 511×
- Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri· 1956-11-12· cited 106×
- Lunsford v. City of BryanTexas Supreme Court· 1957-01-09· cited 57×
- Householder v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri· 1884-10-15· cited 53×
- Bellerive Country Club v. McVeySupreme Court of Missouri· 1955-11-14· cited 29×
- Craig v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1951-11-12· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Allai v. ThatchSupreme Court of Missouri· 1950-11-13· cited 23×
- Tallman Company v. LatalSupreme Court of Missouri· 1955-11-14· cited 17×
- Trustees of Columbia University v. HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1945-03-09· cited 17×
- Local Union No. 324, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Upshur-Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1953-09-10· cited 14×
- Quill v. EisenhowerNew York Supreme Court· 1952-05-01· cited 10×
- State on the Information of ConnettSupreme Court of Missouri· 1956-12-10· cited 8×
- Erie County Water Authority v. KramerNew York Supreme Court· 1955-07-27· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.