Wyoming Supreme Court· 10/29/1982
Quenzer v. Quenzer
Citations
- 653 P.2d 295
- 1982 Wyo. LEXIS 398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “By invoking the power of the district court to grant affirmative relief, the appellant waived his special appearance and made a general appearance.” Father “cannot withdraw his earlier appearance and escape the jurisdiction of the court.” (citations omitted)
- “By invoking the power of the district court to grant affirmative relief, the appellant waived his special appearance and made a general appearance.” Father “cannot withdraw his earlier appearance and escape the jurisdiction of the court.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Ex Rel. D.S.K. v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-04-25· cited 57×
- Nicholaus v. NicholausWyoming Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 30×
- Marquiss v. MarquissWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-07-07· cited 28×
- Weller v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-06-09· cited 26×
- Fink v. FinkWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-08-07· cited 24×
- In Re JorgensenSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-03-21· cited 23×
- Gjertsen v. HaarWyoming Supreme Court· 2015-04-14· cited 20×
- Spaulding v. SpauldingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-06-06· cited 19×
- In Re ThorensenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-12· cited 18×
- Genoe v. GenoeNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-10-11· cited 17×
- State Ex Rel. Griffin v. District Court of Fifth DistrictWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 13×
- Crites v. AlstonWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-08-07· cited 11×
- Rosics v. HeathWyoming Supreme Court· 1987-12-18· cited 8×
- Ostermiller v. SpurrWyoming Supreme Court· 1998-12-10· cited 8×
- Wyman v. LarnerS.D. Indiana· 1985-12-03· cited 6×
- Kriebel v. KriebelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 5×
- Cricenti v. WeilandMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-05-19· cited 5×
- Manley v. HoagCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-04-19· cited 3×
- Hopeful, a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Kulas f/k/a Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola Hopeful Ltd., a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola and Ted Simola, an individual v. Etchepare, L.L.C., a Wyoming limited liability company Ned Murray Co., a Wyoming partnership GBK Investments, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company and EOG ResWyoming Supreme Court· 2023-05-03· cited 3×
- Upon the Petition of JorgensenSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-03-21· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court· 1947-03-31· cited 419×
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court· 1962-12-10· cited 137×
- Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1958-05-26· cited 132×
- In Re Marriage of HopsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-10-06· cited 58×
- Salmeri v. SalmeriWyoming Supreme Court· 1976-10-13· cited 51×
- Leitner v. LonabaughWyoming Supreme Court· 1965-06-09· cited 49×
- Perry v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-08-19· cited 46×
- Slidell v. ValentineSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-11-12· cited 44×
- State Ex Rel. Valles v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 37×
- Laughton v. LaughtonWyoming Supreme Court· 1953-08-04· cited 36×
- Leslie L. F. v. Constance F.New York Family Court· 1981-07-27· cited 22×
- Dragoo v. DragooCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-09-23· cited 20×
- Tanner v. TannerWyoming Supreme Court· 1971-03-19· cited 19×
- Gill v. GillWyoming Supreme Court· 1961-06-22· cited 14×
- Allison v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-12-07· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel. Klopotek v. District Court of Sheridan CountyWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-12-10· cited 14×
- Application of PierceMontana Supreme Court· 1979-10-25· cited 13×
- Pierce v. PierceMontana Supreme Court· 1982-02-11· cited 12×
- Linch v. HardenWyoming Supreme Court· 1918-12-09· cited 11×
- Wagoner v. SaunierSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1981-02-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.