California Court of Appeal· 12/7/1979
Allison v. Superior Court
Citations
- 99 Cal. App. 3d 993
- 160 Cal. Rptr. 309
- 1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 2392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- California could assert jurisdiction where Texas had not adopted the act, service of process gave only 3-day notice, not 10-day notice, as required by the act, and court found that visitation and custody should be determined in one proceeding
- California could assert jurisdiction where Texas had not adopted the act, service of process gave only 3-day notice, not 10-day notice, as required by the act, and court found that visitation and custody should be determined in one proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fleming
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kumar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-10-28· cited 111×
- In Re Marriage of HopsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-10-06· cited 58×
- Plas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-05-16· cited 46×
- In Re Marriage of LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-08-11· cited 35×
- Perron v. CorretjerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1982-11-30· cited 27×
- Quenzer v. QuenzerWyoming Supreme Court· 1982-10-29· cited 26×
- Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-08-13· cited 20×
- Martinez v. Superior Court, La Paz CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-01-20· cited 14×
- In Re the Marriage of MosierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-07-10· cited 10×
- Pieri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-10-28· cited 8×
- Neger v. NegerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-09-24· cited 3×
- Lough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-07-20· cited 2×
- Bakke v. District Court In & For the Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-05-19· cited 1×
- Bakke v. DISTRICT COURT 4TH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-05-19
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-10-01· cited 179×
- Ferreira v. FerreiraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-07-30· cited 51×
- Jacobs v. TenneyD. Delaware· 1970-08-14· cited 50×
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-10-20· cited 46×
- Clark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-09-14· cited 46×
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-03-28· cited 43×
- Schlumpf v. Superior Court of Trinity CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-03-15· cited 39×
- Henderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-02-15· cited 22×
- Smithkline Corporation v. Sterling Drug, Inc.D. Delaware· 1975-07-09· cited 15×
- Celanese Corp. v. Federal Energy AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 1976-02-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.