Puskar v. Hughes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• costs of returning equipment to seller’s business location and electrifying it did not benefit the purchasers
• “[w]here a contract is rescinded, the rights of the parties under that contract are vitiated or invalidated”
• “[I]nherent in the remedy of rescission is restoration of both parties to the status quo.”
• a court may rescind a contract so as to return the parties to their precontract status
• contention that plaintiffs testimony should have been barred because he was not disclosed as an expert witness pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 220(b) was deemed waived, where defendant failed to object to the testimony at trial on that basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).