Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Soffer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that litigation need not have actually commenced for Rule 408’s federal counterpart to apply
• noting that litigation need not have actually commenced for Rule 408’s federal counterpart to apply
• an error in the admission or exclusion of expert testimony may be deemed harmless unless prejudice is clearly shown
• an error in the admission or exclusion of expert testimony may be deemed harmless unless prejudice is clearly shown
• “The rule is well established that all persons who are indispensable parties to an action must be joined or an order entered without jurisdiction over an indispensable party is null and void”
• “The rule is well established that all persons who are indispensable parties to an action must be joined or an order entered without jurisdiction over an indispensable party is null and void”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).