Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Lawrence
Citations
- 74 Miss. 782
Syllabus
<p>1. Trespass. Jurisdiction. Citizenship. Location. Transitory action.</p> <p>It is no defense to a transitory action of trespass brought in this state that the wrong was done and injury inflicted in another state, and that both plaintiff and defendant, a foreign corporation, were, at the time, are now, and have been continuously since, residents and citizens of such other state.</p> <p>2. Foreign Corporations. Jurisdiction. Code 1892, ji 849.</p> <p>Under code 1892, | 849, foreign corporations may sue and be sued in this state as individual nonresidents may sue and be sued.</p> <p>3. Cause of Action. Laws governing. Tort.</p> <p>Whether or not an ex delicio cause of action exists upon a state of facts, is to be determined by the law of the place where the matters complained of occurred.</p> <p>4. Sleeping Car Company. Legal character. Laws of Illinois.</p> <p>Under the constitution of this state, all sleeping car companies are common carriers, but they are not technically so by the laws of Illinois.</p> <p>5. Punitive Damages. Law of Illinois. Corporations.</p> <p>It is the settled law of Illinois that corporations are liable for all the acts of their agents and servants who commit wrong while performing the master’s business in the scope of their employment, and this to the extent of liability for punitive damages in proper cases.</p> <p>5. Same. Wealth of defendant.</p> <p>The wealth or pecuniary condition of a defendant may be shown with a view of enabling the jury to inflict proper damages by way of punishment in a case where punitive damages may be recovered.</p> <p>6. Proof of Wealth. Corporation.</p> <p>It is not impertinent or incompetent, where proof of the wealth of a corporation defendant is admissible, to inquire (a) the entire' paid-up capital stock of the company; (b) what its liabilities are;. (c) what are the assets of the company; (d) what was the surplus of the company over and above liabilities, and (e) what dividends had been paid stockholders
Judges: Woods
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court· 2021-03-25· cited 1,735×
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 451×
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Estate of WessonMississippi Supreme Court· 1987-11-12· cited 73×
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. KeysMississippi Supreme Court· 1975-08-11· cited 71×
- Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1988-05-11· cited 64×
- Miller v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1948-04-12· cited 49×
- Dorr Cattle Co. v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa· 1905-03-14· cited 28×
- Gross v. Chevrolet Country, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 26×
- Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. FoxMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-07-22· cited 22×
- Schreiber v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.D. Kansas· 1978-03-24· cited 22×
- Lauria v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.E.D. New York· 1917-02-27· cited 19×
- Johnson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1915-01-08· cited 16×
- Allyn v. WortmanMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-04-09· cited 12×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BoyceArizona Supreme Court· 1924-02-07· cited 12×
- Nesbit v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1913-11-17· cited 12×
- Hogrobrooks v. Progressive DirectCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2003-11-04· cited 10×
- James v. McMullenCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 1999-02-09· cited 9×
- Pullman Co. v. StrangCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1926-02-16· cited 8×
- Fowler v. KingMississippi Supreme Court· 1965-11-15· cited 7×
- Overing v. SkrmettaMississippi Supreme Court· 1953-11-09· cited 7×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Burns v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court· 1888-01-24· cited 55×
- Nevin v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1883-03-29· cited 45×
- Smith v. WunderlichIllinois Supreme Court· 1873-09-15· cited 30×
- St. Louis, Alton & Chicago Railroad v. DalbyIllinois Supreme Court· 1857-12-15· cited 27×
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court· 1874-09-15· cited 27×
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. DoyleMississippi Supreme Court· 1883-04-15· cited 26×
- Cartwright v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1893-10-15· cited 25×
- Grund v. Van VleckIllinois Supreme Court· 1873-09-15· cited 19×
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. HoldfodtIllinois Supreme Court· 1877-09-15· cited 17×
- N. O., J. & G. N. R. R. v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court· 1874-10-15· cited 15×
- Becker v. DupreeIllinois Supreme Court· 1874-09-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.