Mississippi Supreme Court· 5/11/1988
Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.
Citations
- 529 So. 2d 557
- 1988 Miss. LEXIS 242
- 1988 WL 48800
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the doctrine of forum non conveniens cannot be applied to dismiss a case if it is barred elsewhere by a statute of limitations, unless the defendant is willing to waive the statute of limitations defense
- Delaware residents' action against eighteen nonresident corporate defendants for asbestos poisoning which were engaged in business in state and subject to process in state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDaniel v. RitterMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-11-29· cited 116×
- Cycles, Ltd. v. W.J. Digby, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1989-12-06· cited 95×
- Bell v. BellMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-12· cited 88×
- Smith v. SneedMississippi Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 70×
- Trust Company Bank v. United States Gypsum CompanyFifth Circuit· 1992-02-24· cited 68×
- Allison v. ITE Imperial Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1991-03-26· cited 49×
- Illinois Central RR Co. v. TravisMississippi Supreme Court· 2002-02-28· cited 45×
- Long v. MEMORIAL HOSP. AT GULFPORTMississippi Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 40×
- Patel v. Telerent Leasing Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 36×
- Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. TircuitMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-11-29· cited 30×
- Johnson v. G.D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-18· cited 30×
- Rawls v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-06-03· cited 28×
- DeFoe v. Great Southern Nat. Bank, NAMississippi Supreme Court· 1989-07-19· cited 27×
- Clark v. Luvel Dairy Products, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-12-16· cited 24×
- Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. FoxMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-07-22· cited 22×
- Stanbury v. LarsenWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-12-10· cited 21×
- Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-05-09· cited 18×
- Williams v. Taylor MacHinery, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1988-07-13· cited 16×
- Albert v. Allied Glove Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 16×
- Paul Walls v. General Motors, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1990-07-18· cited 13×
Cites
122 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 5,292×
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 4,581×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1821-03-18· cited 2,076×
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court· 1964-01-13· cited 1,211×
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 1,073×
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 800×
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court· 1885-12-07· cited 499×
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. PahlaviNew York Court of Appeals· 1984-07-05· cited 382×
- Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court· 1907-11-18· cited 280×
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court· 1924-02-25· cited 268×
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court· 1904-04-11· cited 239×
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court· 1904-05-16· cited 237×
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1973-06-05· cited 218×
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 177×
- Tedford v. DempseyMississippi Supreme Court· 1983-09-14· cited 168×
- Hughes v. FetterSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 162×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.