Puhr v. Kansas City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius” means “inclusion by specific mention excludes what is not mentioned”
• under the doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, inclusion by specific mention excludes what is not mentioned
• “The Macomb County Charter unambiguously grants to the Commission the discretionary authority to approve contracts.”
• “[T]he doctrine of expressio unius est exclusio alterius, or inclusion by specific mention excludes what is not mentioned.”
• “[T]he word ‘may’ is used to express opportunity or permission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).