· 5/9/1936
Seely v. Board of Public Utilities
Citations
- 143 Kan. 965
- 57 P.2d 471
- 1936 Kan. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Thus, when a litigant challenges a hospital’s invocation of the peer-review privilege, an in camera evidentiary hearing is required.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.