Pugh v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The evidence was sufficient to sustain the jury's finding of guilt where \[the appellant] argues that he merely kept the video equipment beyond his lease period and that he intended to eventually return the equipment to National Video.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Farrior v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-09-11· cited 166×
• Perkins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-11-19· cited 97×
• Hoobler v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-08-18· cited 26×
• Carroll v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-08-27· cited 17×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1995-03-24· cited 12×
• Slater v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-09-21· cited 6×
• Carroll v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-11-19
• Curry v. Interstate Express, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-07-26

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• McMann v. Richardson
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
• Michel v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
• Affronti v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
• Danny Ray Mylar, A/K/A Danny Ray Miles v. State of Alabama
  Eleventh Circuit· 1982-04-01· cited 67×
• Craig v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-12-29· cited 51×
• Andersen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-08-24· cited 27×
• Sales v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-07-19· cited 17×
• Tallant v. Grain Mart, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1983-06-03· cited 13×