Skip to main content

Pugh v. State

Citations

  • 584 So. 2d 781
  • 1991 WL 150385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following the holding in United States v. Diaz , 585 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1978)
  • Pugh's credibility was at issue, and the jury should have been instructed that his prior convictions were only to be considered for the purpose of attacking his credibility
  • trial court should, sua sponte, provide limiting instruction that prior convictions are to be considered only for purpose of attacking defendant's credibility where prior convictions offered are identical to charge on which defendant is currently being tried
  • trial court should, sua sponte, provide limiting instruction that prior convictions are to be considered only for purpose of attacking defendant's credibility where prior convictions offered are identical to charge on which defendant is currently being tried

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Sullivan and McRae

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.