Pugh v. Goord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A sua sponte award of summary judgment may well be appropriate if it is clear that all of the evidentiary material a party might submit is before the court and no material issue of fact exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sadallah v. City Of Utica
  Second Circuit· 2004-09-03· cited 96×
• NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v. City of New York
  S.D. New York· 2004-04-21· cited 23×
• Navigators Insurance v. Department of Justice
  D. Connecticut· 2016-01-05· cited 8×
• Pugh v. Goord
  Second Circuit· 2003-09-24· cited 7×
• Christman v. Kick
  D. Connecticut· 2004-10-28· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Turner v. Safley
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 6,491×
• Mcpherson v. Coombe
  Second Circuit· 1999-04-22· cited 339×
• Otokoyama Co. v. Wine of Japan Import, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1999-04-29· cited 88×
• Carolyn Denise Irby v. New York City Transit Authority (m.a.b.s.t.o.a.)
  Second Circuit· 2001-08-22· cited 87×
• Ramsey v. Coughlin
  Second Circuit· 1996-08-27· cited 50×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1999-09-17· cited 47×
• Cancel v. Goord
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-12-11· cited 8×
• Pugh v. Goord
  S.D. New York· 2002-01-03· cited 5×
• Cancel v. Goord
  New York Supreme Court· 1999-07-06· cited 4×