Puente Arizona v. Arpaio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Driehaus’s “constitutional interest” requirement is “satisfied when a plaintiff challenges a law on constitutional grounds,” such as the “Supremacy Clause”
• finding Driehaus’s “constitutional interest” requirement is “satisfied when a plaintiff challenges a law on constitutional grounds,” such as the “Supremacy Clause”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).