Skip to main content

Puckett v. State

Citations

  • 284 A.2d 252
  • 13 Md. App. 584
  • 1971 Md. App. LEXIS 317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence of presence of marijuana plants on property Puckett jointly owned with his wife was not sufficient to create rational inference that Puckett was in possession of the marijuana
  • holding evidence of marijuana plants on premises defendant owned with his wife insufficient where marijuana plants were grown in an “uncultivated” area and there was a “total absence of evidence of [the defendant’s] involvement”
  • holding evidence of presence of marijuana plants on property Puckett jointly owned with his wife was not sufficient to create rational inference that Puckett was 28 in possession of the marijuana
  • husband who was often away from home acquitted where wife grew 16 marijuana plants in backyard
  • husband who was often away from home acquitted where wife grew 16 marijuana plants in backyard
  • “Ownership and exclusive possession of property may in some circumstances be sufficient to create a rational inference that the owner was in possession of a prohibited substance growing thereon”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Moylan, Gilbert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.