Skip to main content
· 10/20/1980

Prutch v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 618 P.2d 657
  • 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1507
  • 1980 Colo. LEXIS 751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that there is an obligation imposed by the UCC on buyers to mitigate incidental and consequential damages caused by a seller's breach
  • consumer must establish that the defect arose in the course of manufacturer-distribution and before purchase
  • “To impose an impossible or unreasonably onerous burden of proof is to deny many consumers a meaningful remedy.”
  • “‘[T]he plaintiffs’ burden is limited to showing a defect existed at the time the [product] in question first came into the plaintiffs’ possession.’”
  • “Recovery of lost profits is determined by whether the consequences resulting in damages were foreseeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.