Skip to main content
· 2/16/1971

Paul Lewis, D/B/A Lewis Lumber Company v. Mobil Oil Corporation, a Corporation

Citations

  • 438 F.2d 500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indication by buyer that transaction is still troublesome and must be watched is sufficient notice
  • notice sufficient where no bad faith claim against plaintiff asserted and re peated complaints that “transaction was troublesome” were given
  • consequential damages recoverable by sawmill operator for oil company's breach of warranty of fitness of lubricating oil furnished for operation of hydraulic system included both direct expenses and loss of profits
  • existence of implied warranty of fitness where buyer made it known oil was purchased for his hydraulic system, that he didn’t know which oil to use, and he was relying on Mobil to supply a proper product
  • Where the machinery had performed satisfactorily with other similar products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthes, Me-Haffy, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.